Friday, June 29, 2012

Fwd: A statistical approach to selecting and confirming validation targets in -omics experiments

Fwd: please follow footer link
A statistical approach to selecting and confirming validation targets in -omics experiments

Genomic technologies are, by their very nature, designed for hypothesis generation. In some cases, the hypotheses that are generated require that genome scientists confirm findings about specific genes or proteins. But one major advantage of high-throughput technology is that global genetic, genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic behaviors can be observed. Manual confirmation of every statistically significant genomic result is prohibitively expensive. This has led researchers in genomics to adopt the strategy of confirming only a handful of the most statistically significant results, a small subset chosen for biological interest, or a small random subset. But there is no standard approach for selecting and quantitatively evaluating validation targets.

Here we present a new statistical method and approach for statistically validating lists of significant results based on confirming only a small random sample. We apply our statistical method to show that the usual practice of confirming only the most statistically significant results does not statistically validate result lists. We analyze an extensively validatedRNA-sequencing experiment to show that confirming a random subset can statistically validate entire lists of significant results. Finally, we analyze multiple publicly available microarray experiments to show that statistically validating random samples can both

(i) provide evidence to confirm long gene lists and

(ii) save thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours of labor over manual validation of each significant result.

For high-throughput -omics studies, statistical validation is a cost-effective and statistically valid approach to confirming lists of significant results.

(Original Post: BMC Bioinformatics - Latest articles.)